Boise inks deal with UT Martin in 2013

(Because I know for a fact that almost 10% of Boise's wins in the last 10 years came from strictly ranked opponents alone).

spinocchio wrote-First of all "wannabe", who said anything about 10 Years? Secondly, "I know for a Fact that ALMOST" doesn't reflect a FACT now does it? 

Not to mention the FACT that you are Wrong. 

FACT? You don't know what FACT is.

But First,  to answer your question. You did. What you said was "Boise........., boasting a record built on.....low level talent that represents 95% of their wins"    Well Boise started building wins against AQs and ranked opponents in '02. That was the year of their 1st AQ win. Exactly ten seasons ago. 10 years. 

To your other mistaken point. My numbers are correct.  Like I said, almost 10% (9.322% To be exact), of Boise's wins in the last decade came against true year end ranked opponents alone. Boise had 118 wins in that period. 11 were against ranked opponents. 9.3%.


See, this is what happens when you tell the truth. It's easy to prove.


NOW, how about your numbers, spinocchio? Prove your "95%" wins against low level talent claim, sponocchio. 

they have also racked up the 2nd highest win % against ranked opponents in the last 10 years, and the highest win % against ranked AQs in the last 10 years.  

spinocchio wrote-Here we go again with the wonderful "Win %" gimmick of the Boise Wannabe. 

If you weren't such a dunce and could remember what you wrote, you would realize that "wins %" were your words, not mine. I used your own criteria. 



 

spinocchio wrote-Guess what Genius; If I play ONE ranked team and WIN in 10 years, I will most likely have the #1 Ranked Winning % in the Land. 
I wonder what James Madison Univerity's winning percentage over RANKED opponents is over the last 5 Years? 

Well duh...., and you are a consultant? WOW!

It certainly has no relevancy so why do you care?  Oh, I get it, this is where you start bagging anything that has to do with Boise, like VT becuz they were one of Boise's opponents. Sorry spooge(Hookem's analogy fits well), Boise can't control what their opponents do or don't do. Although, while Boise may have had something to do with VT losing to James Madison, I would say that it had more to do with VT's AD, scheduling a top 10 Boise team and James Madison in the very same week. I'm sure he learned a tough lesson.

Now I have a question for you SomeBarney: 

How many RANKED teams will Boise Beat This Coming 2012 Season in YOUR Opinion? How many AQ Teams?

Hard to say before a single snap by any team. Probably the same number as half of the bcs bowl participants, since that has been the trend for the last couple years. Boise played as many or more ranked opponents than 6 of the 10 bcs bowl participants in their 12 game seasons, including the national champ, this past season.

Boise played the same number or more final ranked opponents in their respective 12 game regular schedules as half of the final top 25 last season.  



And during the season before, Boise played as many or more than 6 of the 10 bcs bowl participants during their respective 12 game schedules and the same or more than 11 of the top 25.



# of AQs? Who cares? It isn't AQs that have beaten Boise lately, it's top NAQs. You have to go back 5 years for a Boise loss to an AQ.


Several NAQs on Boise schedules have been better than over half of the AQs, so it's a silly question.  


Sorry if I don't share your AQ self importance, but once again, another irrelevant question from spinocchio.  

Hard to say before a single snap by any team. Probably the same number as half of the bcs bowl participants, since that has been the trend for the last couple years. Boise played as many or more ranked opponents than 6 of the 10 bcs bowl participants in their 12 game seasons, including the national champ, this past season.

Boise played the same number or more final ranked opponents in their respective 12 game regular schedules as half of the final top 25 last season.  



And during the season before, Boise played as many or more than 6 of the 10 bcs bowl participants during their respective 12 game schedules and the same or more than 11 of the top 25.



# of AQs? Who cares? It isn't AQs that have beaten Boise lately, it's top NAQs. You have to go back 5 years for a Boise loss to an AQ.


Several NAQs on Boise schedules have been better than over half of the AQs, so it's a silly question.  


Sorry if I don't share your AQ self importance, but once again, another irrelevant question from spinocchio.

Check out ole Barney, chewing that Pillow and trying to convince people that Boise plays a tough schedule. 

Keep it up Barney, it is quite entertaining watching you chase your tail. 

Yes, play New Mexico & Weber State 11 times a year and throw in Michigan State and walla, a toughy of a schedule. 

Go Barney Go. 

  

Illinois my friend, would EASILY match Boise's winning output over the past decade if they had played Boise's scehdule.

Pretty simple Spinny, during Kellen Moores run at BSU, BSU lost to a ranked TCU team in a bowl game, a top 15 Nevada team on the road, and a top 20 TCU team at home.

In the same time period Illinois lost to Fresno State twice, Minnesota twice, Purdue twice, Northwestern, Cincy, Indiana.  Those are just the bad losses spinny.  I am giving them some credit to a middle of the AQ pack loss like 3 times to PSU even though they have been nothing special.

Comments like this make your posts laughable at best.

Now again spinny, who recently has BSU lost to, that we should have defeated.  Now keep the answer relevent now spinny.

This message has been removed by the administrator.

Hard to say before a single snap by any team. Probably the same number as half of the bcs bowl participants, since that has been the trend for the last couple years. Boise played as many or more ranked opponents than 6 of the 10 bcs bowl participants in their 12 game seasons, including the national champ, this past season.

Boise played the same number or more final ranked opponents in their respective 12 game regular schedules as half of the final top 25 last season.  



And during the season before, Boise played as many or more than 6 of the 10 bcs bowl participants during their respective 12 game schedules and the same or more than 11 of the top 25.



# of AQs? Who cares? It isn't AQs that have beaten Boise lately, it's top NAQs. You have to go back 5 years for a Boise loss to an AQ.


Several NAQs on Boise schedules have been better than over half of the AQs, so it's a silly question.  


Sorry if I don't share your AQ self importance, but once again, another irrelevant question from spinocchio.

spinocchio wrote-Check out ole Barney, chewing that Pillow and trying to convince people that Boise plays a tough schedule. 

Keep it up Barney, it is quite entertaining watching you chase your tail. 

Yes, play New Mexico & Weber State 11 times a year and throw in Michigan State and walla, a toughy of a schedule. 

Go Barney Go. 

Did I say anything about a tough schedule? Nope.

Why bother to quote someone if you are not going to address any of it? 


How about addressing where you are getting called out on your FACTs? I take it you can't stand up for your own integrity.  

In the same time period Illinois lost to Fresno State twice, Minnesota twice, Purdue twice, Northwestern, Cincy, Indiana.  Those are just the bad losses spinny.  I am giving them some credit to a middle of the AQ pack loss like 3 times to PSU even though they have been nothing special.

Comments like this make your posts laughable at best.

Now again spinny, who recently has BSU lost to, that we should have defeated.  Now keep the answer relevent now spinny.

 

Sure Bunt.  In that Time Span, Illinois has also beaten 5 Ranked AQ Football Teams; Penn State, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Northwestern & Arizona State. Too, Illinois had to PLAY 19 RANKED AQ Football Teams.

Boise hasn't had to face Anywhere CLOSE to that many.  As they say my friend, its in the numbers.

Who did Boise lose to that they shouldn't have? I suppose the answer would be, noone.  They were overrated every year so it came as no surprise when they lost to Nevada & TCU. 

In fact, since "kellen moore" joined the team, Boise has been Embarrassed by a pitiful 4-7 Washington Husky team, beaten by a 7-5 ECU team, beaten by Hawaii, Nevada and TCU twice.

Just keeping it relevant.

 

You've claimed Boise was in the same class as Mt Union, Portland st, Uc Davis, James Madison, etc., etc., over and over. 

Wrong again. I clearly said, if AQ's were "ducking" Boise, then Boise is "ducking" Mt. Union.

Perfectly justified analogy I might add.

Again, tell me why it was such a Big Thing when Boise beat VT, but yet not so big when James Madison beat them WORSE the following week?

I am certain you will have a great excuse.

In fact, since "kellen moore" joined the team, Boise has been Embarrassed by a pitiful 4-7 Washington Husky team, beaten by a 7-5 ECU team, beaten by Hawaii, Nevada and TCU twice.

Just keeping it relevant.

So now you bring up the "Unranked" BSU 2007 season?  When Kellen was redshirted.  Congrats.  Go ahead and bring up the results, but don't act like Kellen was slinging it around the smurf turf.

7-5 ECU team lost a bowl game by 3 points.  In a bowl game to a guy named Chris Johnson?  Ever heard of him?

A bad loss to Washington, agreed.

Hawaii, who was ranked #15 at years end after losing a BCS game.

Lost by an XP twice to TCU, both times with TCU being inside the top #20.

Lost to a top #15 Nevada on the road in our "Rivalry Game".  Yes, spinny Nevada is BSU's one and only rival.

If that is all you got in 5 years, then you already have your answer.

Sure Bunt.  In that Time Span, Illinois has also beaten 5 Ranked AQ Football Teams; Penn State, Wisconsin, Ohio State, Northwestern & Arizona State. Too, Illinois had to PLAY 19 RANKED AQ Football Teams.

Boise hasn't had to face Anywhere CLOSE to that many.  As they say my friend, its in the numbers.

It only matters, if you turn around and beat the teams that you should beat.  Instead they lost to Minnesota twice in three years, Fresno twice in two years, Purdue twice in two years, Northwestern, exc.

That is why it doesn't matter.


BSU last lost to somebody that they shouldn't have in 2007 by Spinny's concession.  Well, I guess technically in 2008 (Bowl Game) vs a very good non-AQ program in ECU who just happened to have Chris Johnson go off for 250 yards rushing.

He now does these same things on Sundays.

Any idiot knows this.

So now you bring up the "Unranked" BSU 2007 season?  When Kellen was redshirted.  Congrats.  Go ahead and bring up the results, but don't act like Kellen was slinging it around the smurf turf

If he was good enough, he would have played. 

 

7-5 ECU team lost a bowl game by 3 points.  In a bowl game to a guy named Chris Johnson?  Ever heard of him?

5 teams beat them and they were unranked.  What's your point?

 

Hawaii, who was ranked #15 at years end after losing a BCS game.

Ok?  Again, they were given the benefit of the doubt that year. Why?  Because they were unbeaten in the WAC right? 

 

Lost by an XP twice to TCU, both times with TCU being inside the top #20.

Ok? OU beat the very Same TCU team by 30,  that beat boise. Again?

 

Lost to a top #15 Nevada on the road in our "Rivalry Game".  Yes, spinny Nevada is BSU's one and only rival.

If that is all you got in 5 years, then you already have your answer.

And its a Solid Answer.  Again, we have no idea about Boise.  For every surprising win, I show you a surprising loss. So, is Boise that great or a mirage?

Wrong again. I clearly said, if AQ's were "ducking" Boise, then Boise is "ducking" Mt. Union. 

No. It is you that is wrong. As usual. 

You can't even remember what you write in the same day, let alone, over time.  Typical for a pinocchio.

Which gives you zero credability and even less integrity.

Again, tell me why it was such a Big Thing when Boise beat VT, but yet not so big when James Madison beat them WORSE the following week? 

Geez, can't you ever get any facts straight? Both games were in the same week.

And no one said anything about it not being a big thing for James Madison to beat VT. I'm sure they were ectatic. 


Now, how about you addressing all the questions I've asked you?


How about you try to prove any of your so called facts for the good folks here?


  

Which gives you zero credability and even less integrity.

You think I am search for you to validate my credibility and integrity Barney?

5 teams beat them and they were unranked.  What's your point?

My point is simple, when you have a freak of nature like Chris Johnson, guess what?  Every few weeks, he is going to go off.  Even a bad Detroit Lions team occasionally looked great when Barry took over.  Simple.

And it was a FG loss, not a blowout.

Ok?  Again, they were given the benefit of the doubt that year. Why?  Because they were unbeaten in the WAC right? 

No, I don't think that they were great.  Good yes, but not great.  It was a loss to a good team on the road, in HAWAII.

Ok? OU beat the very Same TCU team by 30,  that beat boise. Again?

Well, by 25.  Or were they the team that only lost to Utah that year by 3?  Perspective.  Ask an Alabama Fan. They also beat #8 BYU by 25 points 35-7.  And again, we lost by an XP.


I didn't mean to get sucked into this garbage thread, but somehow I did. 

Going to bed, spinny. 


Goodnight. 

You think I am search for you to validate my credibility and integrity Barney? 

Of course, if you can really back up your statements. But I think we all know you can't. I just want to make sure that every one here knows it, in case some are just tuning in. 


 

It only matters, if you turn around and beat the teams that you should beat.  Instead they lost to Minnesota twice in three years, Fresno twice in two years, Purdue twice in two years, Northwestern, exc.

Again, they had to play much tougher competition between times.  As you well know. 

I am sure you remember what Northern Illinois did to Fresno in Boise.

So again, it's in the numbers.  

Of course, if you can really back up your statements. But I think we all know you can't. I just want to make sure that every one here knows it, in case some are just tuning in. 

Very few are "just tuning in" and everyone is quite aware of how badly overmatched you are Barney. 

Now run along so Bunt and I can finish the grown up conversation.

Of course, if you can really back up your statements. But I think we all know you can't. I just want to make sure that every one here knows it, in case some are just tuning in.


I am no fan of spinny but I actually remember the posts an converstation you two are talking about. Spinny didnt compare BSU to those smaller school he said that BSU was no better then the AQ teams that BSU fans try to trash. BSU fans talk about AQs not doing H&H with BSU an spinny basically said BSU didnt do H&H with smaller teams either.


So he didnt compare them he used them as an example.

Spinny didnt compare BSU to those smaller school he said that BSU was no better then the AQ teams that BSU fans try to trash. BSU fans talk about AQs not doing H&H with BSU an spinny basically said BSU didnt do H&H with smaller teams either.


So he didnt compare them he used them as an example.

Correct.  In fact, I explained this Hypocrisy in a detailed format as to not confuse.  In fact, it has always been my stance that this has nothing to do with the Boise team or fans, and everything to do with the Boise Athletic Dept. and their bogus claims.

Actually, I said it repeatedly. 

But then Barney who wants to Smiles someday somehow missed it.

Again, why do you even debate with this fake "donkey clown" BSU fan.

He isn't.


That simple.